MediQo vs. iScribe: Which AI Scribe Is Best for General Practice?
Choosing the right AI scribe for your clinic isn’t just about how accurately conversations are transcribed. For Australian general practice, the real value lies in how well the AI fits into clinical workflows, protects patient data, integrates with existing systems, and reduces total administrative burden — not just note-taking time.
In this comparison, we break down the key differences between MediQo and i-Scribe, so you can decide whether a standalone AI scribe or a comprehensive medical AI platform is the right fit for your practice now — and into the future.
Table of contents:
AI Scribe: What’s Included?
AI scribes are designed to reduce the documentation burden on clinicians by capturing consultations and converting them into structured clinical notes. However, not all AI scribes are built the same — particularly when it comes to real-time usability, workflow integration, and downstream clinical support.
MediQo’s AI Scribe is part of an all-in-one medical AI platform, built specifically for Australian healthcare workflows. It operates during consultations (not after), allows clinicians to view and complete notes in real time, integrates directly with practice management systems, and connects seamlessly to additional tools such as smart billing, care and treatment plans, patient letters, telehealth, and AI clinical assistance.
i-Scribe is positioned as a standalone AI scribe, focused primarily on dictation and documentation generation. While it supports live dictation, clinicians must pause or complete the consultation to generate structured outputs, and the platform does not extend into billing intelligence, care planning, telehealth, or broader clinical workflow automation.
Key Differences Explained
Both MediQo and i-Scribe generate clinical notes from clinician–patient conversations, but how and when those notes are available differs significantly.
MediQo captures and structures notes in real time, allowing clinicians to review, edit, and finalise documentation during the consultation itself — including during telehealth sessions and while using headsets. Outputs are context-aware, informed by patient history and visit type, and designed to flow directly into downstream workflows such as billing, care plans, and patient communication.
i-Scribe supports live dictation, but clinicians must pause or finish the consultation to generate formal documentation outputs. Notes are not available for completion before the consult ends, and outputs are not embedded into broader clinical workflows in real time.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Security and Data Protection
Why Security Matters in Healthcare AI
Healthcare AI must meet strict standards around privacy, data sovereignty, and compliance. Where data is hosted — and how the AI model is architected — has a direct impact on clinical risk and patient safety.
MediQo is designed for Australian healthcare compliance, with 100% Australian data hosting in Sydney and Melbourne, a proprietary healthcare-specific AI model, HL7 and FHIR alignment, triggered-only listening, and compliance with HIPAA, SOC2, and ISO 27001. It does not operate as a generic ChatGPT wrapper.
i-Scribe provides limited publicly available information regarding healthcare-grade security frameworks, proprietary AI architecture, or interoperability standards beyond basic privacy compliance. This may be sufficient for dictation use cases, but offers less assurance for practices seeking scalable, enterprise-grade AI adoption.
Security Comparison
Integrations
Why Integrations Matter
An AI scribe only delivers real efficiency gains when it integrates seamlessly into existing practice systems. Without deep integrations, AI becomes another isolated tool clinicians must manage.
MediQo integrates natively with leading Australian PMS platforms, enabling documentation, billing, appointments, and care plans to flow into a single connected workflow without double handling or manual copying.
i-Scribe’s integrations are limited or unclear, and documentation outputs typically require additional steps to move into downstream systems, increasing administrative overhead for practices.
Integration Comparison
Sign-Up and Onboarding Experience
Getting Started Matters
Successful AI adoption across a practice depends on onboarding, configuration, and training — not just sign-up speed.
MediQo provides clinic-level onboarding, including multi-user setup, role-based access, workflow configuration, staff training, and IT partner support. This ensures consistent adoption across doctors, nurses, and administrative teams.
i-Scribe is typically deployed at an individual clinician level, with limited support for practice-wide rollout, role-based permissions, or structured onboarding for larger teams.
Onboarding Comparison
Pricing and value
One Tool vs an Entire Platform
Standalone scribes can appear cost-effective initially, but many practices quickly discover they need additional tools for billing, care planning, telehealth, and patient communication.
MediQo delivers greater long-term value by bundling multiple AI capabilities into a single platform, reducing vendor sprawl, integration complexity, and total cost of ownership.
i-Scribe may suit practices seeking dictation support only, but clinics aiming to modernise both clinical and administrative workflows typically require a more comprehensive solution.